That's the point at which, for skeptics who may be
aware, when it becomes a philosophical question
whether the situation evolved long after the fact to his
benefit,was it cunningly contrived or happenstance?
During the prosecution and trial of the terror cabal
it was known he received a handsome remuneration
for infiltrating the group and conveying their plot
back to the authorities in an apprehended terrorist
action to target government agencies along with the
head of government. Yet it was his undercover work
that provided the fuel of evidence for investigators.
Now years later he is a respected academic his specialty
an inside track on Islamist fundamentalists for whom
murder, mayhem and instability is a badge of honour
as he reaps double benefit then and now; the payout
followed by the equally earned professionalism aided
by the sanctimony of self-sacrifice to an unpopular
choice all in the interests of justice, peace and security
and above all, restoring popular trust in Islamic faith.
Is the depth of conviction to be measured in terms of
defence of the divine or merely pedestrian opportunism?
No comments:
Post a Comment