Examine
Language; what, if you except some few primitive elements (of natural
sound) what is it all but Metaphors, recognized as such, or no longer
recognized? Carlyle.
All slang is metaphor, and all metaphor is poetry. G. K. Chesterton.
I hate to hunt down a tired metaphor. Byron.
Language is the archives of history. Emerson.
Language
- human language - after all is but little better than the croak and
cackle of fowls, and other utterances of brute nature - sometimes not so
adequate. Hawthorne.
Every language is a temple, in which the soul of those who speak it is enshrined. O.W. Holmes.
Languages are the pedigrees of nations. Samuel Johnson.
It
is quite simply not so, that old conceit that a picture is worth a
thousand words. We convey more meaning by the language we use and the
way in which we use it than a picture possibly could. If words are not
intrinsically vital to who and what we are, why then do we flagellate
ourselves over our failures, when we had the opportunity, to express our
deep emotional attachment in words that matter, to those we cherish?
The
written word is solid, not ephemeral, like an image, fleeting and of
the moment. That may or may not be recalled; certainly never in the
fine detail that meticulous and loving description can describe through
the use of language, words.
Words convey the robustness of keen
observation, the delicacy of fine thought, and every variation of each.
Words are the expressive heart of our collective souls. Their meaning
can present as gossamer-light, tickling sensibilities, or bracingly
emphatic, moving us to alert response.
All living things have
their expressions of being, their language known to themselves; from
whales to crickets, robins to elephants. Unlike humankind they cannot
share the exquisite pleasure of reading their history, recalling their
predecessors, sharing creative imagination. We have been especially
gifted. We homo sapiens sapiens, modern humankind.
Pity the
persons - and they are legion - illiterate, incapable of deep expression
of drawing deeply from the peerless draught of world knowledge. To
them remains the irrelevancies of mutely peering at moving pictures.
Can they realize the full thinking potential that is a human life?
Think
of descriptives, how they limn the individual by the nomenclature human
verbal ingenuity has evolved to describe individuality: repugnant,
resourceful, comical, tempestuous, covert, beguiling, benign, brilliant,
avuncular, mystical, iconic, solicitous, evanescent, fragile,
contemptuous, grovelling, malleable, mesmerizing, compelling, bestial,
autocratic, miserable, mischievous, creative, bumptious, fearful,
tragic, snivelling, riotous, joyful, youthful, grim, aged, beautiful,
serene, contemplative, scornful, tendentious, manipulative, scheming,
loving, overbearing, intrepid, wise, lethargic, buoyant, uncompromising,
tender, wistful.
Any one of these words, or in combination with
one another paint an instantly recognizable personality, type, shape,
appearance. In the mind of the reader, or the recipient of the verbal
description, there is clear and cogent recognition of type and
stereotype. Can a picture adequately portray those idiosyncrasies of
temperament and behaviour?
Abrasive, sardonic, surly, repressed,
calm, assertive, dominating, obsessive, obsequious, dismissive, genial,
all descriptive nomenclature identifying and delineating human
character, instantly conjuring opinion and observation at a remove;
introducing personality. Sweeping the reader into a state of personal
presence, through the charmed recognition of the nature of language.
Language
challenges us in other ways, as well, as instruments to offend, to
hurt, to bully. Belligerent and violent it can most certainly be,
adversarial in the extreme, leading the listener or the reader to
profound conclusions and encouraging them to match those words in
self-defence, meeting offence. The antidote for that kind of language
is expressed as compassion, patience, acceptance and understanding.
Language has led to war and it has led to peace. It can confound and it
can clarify. Invite or reject, bring anger or solace.
It speaks
of our common interests yet often fails to ignite a necessary passion
among antagonists to surmount differences. But if carefully and
honestly constructed it has the capacity to close wounds and narrow
great chasms of mistrust.
Language and how we use or abuse it, is
a reflection of who we are, our desires and aspirations; our humanity,
failed or triumphant. It is our responsibility to value its potential
and to use it well; creatively, carefully, reflectively and honourably
with conviction and respect.
And to value its capacity to elevate
the human spirit, imbue us with hope. Transport us to a better place
inside our minds, very often outside our immediate experiences.
Language
is the memory of the human race. It is as a thread or nerve of life
running through all the ages, connecting them into one common, prolonged
and advancing existence. William Smith.
Language is the amber in which a thousand precious and subtle thoughts have been safely embedded and preserved. R. C. Trench.
Language
is the expression of ideas, and if the people of one country cannot
preserve an identity of ideas they cannot retain an identity of language. Noah Webster.
The style of an author should be the image of his mind, but the choice and command of language is the fruit of exercise. Edward Gibbon.
Man acts as though he were the shaper and master of language while in fact language remains the master of man. Martin Heidegger.